_________________________________________________________________

  E M P L O Y E E   B E N E F I T S ,   C O M P E N S A T I O N
                    &   P E N S I O N   L A W
                  Vol. 5,  No. 12: June 17, 2004
_________________________________________________________________

Publisher:     LSN Employment, Labor, Compensation & Pension Journals
               a division of
               Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. (SSEP)
               and Social Science Research Network (SSRN)

Editor:        PAMELA PERUN
               Urban Institute
               Mailto:pamela@planetnow.com

Copyright:     SSEP, Inc. 2004. All rights reserved.

Leading Social Science Research Delivered To Your Desktop
               http://www.SSRN.Com/

   ___________________________________________________________

                      Topic of This Issue:
                     Executive Compensation
   ___________________________________________________________


SEARCHING THE SSRN ELECTRONIC LIBRARY
 To search the entire SSRN Electronic Library by author, title,
 JEL code, or full text of the abstracts in our database, please
 visit http://papers.ssrn.com/

 To browse all abstracts published in this journal, please visit
 http://www.ssrn.com/link/benefits-compensation-pension-law.html

REDISTRIBUTION
 Individual and professional subscriptions to the journal are for
 single users. It is a violation of copyright to redistribute
 this document electronically or otherwise without the explicit
 permission of Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc.
 Site licenses for organizations are available by contacting
 Mailto:Site@SSRN.Com

SIGN OFF
 SUBSCRIPTION MANAGEMENT
 You can change your journal subscriptions by going to the SSRN
 User HeadQuarters at the following link: http://hq.ssrn.com
 Please enter the email address where you received this email in
 the "Your Email Address" field and click "Submit". Click on your
 name on the next screen, and your User ID and Password will be
 emailed to you. Once you have received your login information and
 successfully logged in, you will be able to change your journal
 selections. If you have questions or problems with this process,
 please email UserSupport@SSRN.com or call 877-SSRNHelp (toll free
 877.777.6435).

ALIGNMENT
 If this document is misaligned, please set type face to a
 non-proportional font such as Courier 10.

PAPER DOWNLOADS
 If you need assistance downloading papers from our web site,
 please contact Mailto:Support@SSRN.Com


T A B L E   of   C O N T E N T S
_________________________________________________________________


NEW and FORTHCOMING ARTICLES

"Secret Compensation"
      North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 835, 2004
     IMAN ANABTAWI
        University of California, Los Angeles
        School of Law

WORKING PAPERS

"Earnings Manipulation and Managerial Investment Decisions:
 Evidence from Sponsored Pension Plans"
     DANIEL B. BERGSTRESSER
        Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
        Department of Economics
     MIHIR A. DESAI
        Harvard University
        Finance Unit
        National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
     JOSHUA RAUH
        Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
        Department of Economics


"What Do CEOs Bargain For? An Empirical Study of Key Legal
 Components of CEO Employment Contracts"
     STEWART JON SCHWAB
        Cornell Law School
     RANDALL S. THOMAS
        Vanderbilt University School of Law


"Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive
 Compensation, Part II: Power and Pay"
     LUCIAN ARYE BEBCHUK
        Harvard Law School
        National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
     JESSE M. FRIED
        University of California, Berkeley
        School of Law (Boalt Hall)


"Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive
 Compensation, Part III: The Decoupling of Pay from Performance"
     LUCIAN ARYE BEBCHUK
        Harvard Law School
        National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
     JESSE M. FRIED
        University of California, Berkeley
        School of Law (Boalt Hall)


"Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive
 Compensation, Part IV: Going Forward"
     LUCIAN ARYE BEBCHUK
        Harvard Law School
        National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
     JESSE M. FRIED
        University of California, Berkeley
        School of Law (Boalt Hall)


S S R N   I N F O R M A T I O N
_________________________________________________________________

          * Partners in Publishing
          * Administrative Information
             - Missing issues & change of address
             - Solicitation of abstracts
          * Directors
          * Subscription to SSRN Journals
_________________________________________________________________

ACQUIRING PAPERS
 Download papers directly from the included web address or contact
 the author or other contact person directly. Provide an address
 to which the author or other contact person can send a paper
 copy and mention that you saw the abstract in SSRN. Some of
 SSRN's Partners in Publishing require a subscription or charge a
 fee for electronic downloads.



EDITORIAL POLICIES
 To provide the broadest coverage of research in Employee
 Benefits, Compensation & Pension Law we do not referee working
 papers. We accept abstracts of working papers in Employee
 Benefits, Compensation & Pension Law whose topics suit the
 coverage of the journal and which are part of the worldwide
 scholarly discourse.


N E W   and   F O R T H C O M I N G   Articles
_________________________________________________________________

"Secret Compensation"
      North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 835, 2004

      BY:  IMAN ANABTAWI
              University of California, Los Angeles
              School of Law

Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=527704

Paper ID:  UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 04-9

 Contact:  IMAN ANABTAWI
   Email:  Mailto:Anabtawi@law.ucla.edu
  Postal:  University of California, Los Angeles
           School of Law
           405 Hilgard Avenue
           Box 951476
           Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476  UNITED STATES

ABSTRACT:
 Compensation is the principal means by which companies in the
 United States seek to motivate managers to act in the best
 interests of shareholders. The emphasis on stock options as a
 component of executive pay in the United States also, however,
 encourages opportunistic behavior by managers. Exercise prices
 of executive stock options are typically established as the
 company's stock price on the date the options are granted.
 Managers can therefore enhance the value of their option awards
 by timing grant dates to precede the release of favorable
 corporate news. In fact, evidence suggests that they do so.
 There has been considerable uncertainty over whether such
 behavior constitutes insider trading. This Article attributes
 such uncertainty to gaps in current law. In particular, insider
 trading doctrine easily handles open-market transactions, but it
 does a poor job of addressing situations in which managers deal
 with their own corporations, such as in the case of executive
 stock option grants. In these circumstances, numerous questions
 arise, including whether the corporation or its shareholders
 have been deceived. Drawing on current doctrine and the purposes
 of the insider trading laws, this Article suggests that both
 executives and boards of directors have at least some disclosure
 obligations to shareholders regarding the compensatory element
 of favorably timed grants. Moreover, it may well be that such
 grants are subject to the same "disclose or abstain" rule
 applicable in the traditional insider trading context.

______________________________

W O R K I N G   P A P E R   Abstracts
_________________________________________________________________

"Earnings Manipulation and Managerial Investment Decisions:
 Evidence from Sponsored Pension Plans"

      BY:  DANIEL B. BERGSTRESSER
              Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
              Department of Economics
           MIHIR A. DESAI
              Harvard University
              Finance Unit
              National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
           JOSHUA RAUH
              Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
              Department of Economics

Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=551681

    Date:  May 2004

 Contact:  MIHIR A. DESAI
   Email:  Mailto:mdesai@hbs.edu
  Postal:  Harvard University
           Finance Unit
           Boston, MA 02163  UNITED STATES
   Phone:  617-495-6693
     Fax:  617-496-6592
 Co-Auth:  DANIEL B. BERGSTRESSER
   Email:  Mailto:dberg@mit.edu
  Postal:  Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
           Department of Economics
           50 Memorial Drive
           Cambridge, MA 02142  UNITED STATES
 Co-Auth:  JOSHUA RAUH
   Email:  Mailto:rauh@mit.edu
  Postal:  Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
           Department of Economics
           50 Memorial Drive
           Cambridge, MA 02142  UNITED STATES

ABSTRACT:
 Managers appear to manipulate firm earnings when they
 characterize pension assets to capital markets and alter
 investment decisions to justify, and capitalize on, these
 manipulations. We construct a measure of the sensitivity of
 reported earnings to the assumed long-term rate of return on
 pension assets. Managers are more aggressive with assumed
 long-term rates of return when their assumptions have a greater
 impact on reported earnings. Managers also increase assumed
 rates of return as they prepare to acquire other firms and as
 they exercise stock options, further confirming the
 opportunistic nature of these increases. Decisions about assumed
 rates of return, in turn, influence asset allocation within
 pension plans. Instrumental variables results suggest that a 25
 basis point increase in the assumed rate of return is associated
 with a 5% increase in equity allocation. Taken together, these
 results suggest that earnings manipulation arising from
 managerial motivations influences significant managerial
 investment decisions.


JEL Classification: M41, M52, G23, G30, G11
______________________________

"What Do CEOs Bargain For? An Empirical Study of Key Legal
 Components of CEO Employment Contracts"

      BY:  STEWART JON SCHWAB
              Cornell Law School
           RANDALL S. THOMAS
              Vanderbilt University School of Law

Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=529923

Paper ID:  Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 04-12
    Date:  April 9, 2004

 Contact:  STEWART JON SCHWAB
   Email:  Mailto:sjs15@cornell.edu
  Postal:  Cornell Law School
           #108
           Myron Taylor Hall
           Ithaca, NY 14853  UNITED STATES
   Phone:  607.255.8584
     Fax:  607-255-7193
 Co-Auth:  RANDALL S. THOMAS
   Email:  Mailto:randall.thomas@law.vanderbilt.edu
  Postal:  Vanderbilt University School of Law
           131 21st Avenue South
           Nashville, TN 37203-1181  UNITED STATES

Paper Requests:
 Contact Janis Stewart, Research Paper Series Program, Vanderbilt
 University Law School, 131 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN
 37203. Phone:(615) 322-0028. Fax:(615) 322-6631.
 Mailto:Janis.Stewart@law.vanderbilt.edu

ABSTRACT:
 In this paper, we examine the key legal characteristics of 375
 employment contracts between some of the largest 1500 public
 corporations and their Chief Executive Officers. We look at the
 actual language of these contracts, asking whether and in what
 ways CEO contracts differ from what are thought of as standard
 employment contract features for other workers. Our data provide
 some empirical answers to several common assertions or
 speculations about CEO contracts, and shed light on whether
 these contracts are negotiated solely to suit the preferences of
 CEOs or have provisions that insure that the employers'
 interests are also safeguarded.

 After giving an overview of the general characteristics of a
 CEO employment contract, and the process by which they are
 negotiated, we focus on five contracting issues: (1) the term
 "just cause" that defines when an executive can be terminated
 involuntarily with penalties; (2) the "good reason" termination
 clauses in the contract that permit an executive to leave
 voluntarily without financial penalties; (3) the non-competition
 clauses in the contract; (4) the use of arbitration clauses as a
 method of resolving contractual disputes; and (5) the
 contractual restrictions, if any, on the CEO selling stock
 options. We also discuss some of the less-well known economic
 terms of these contracts, including their length and the level
 of perquisites given to CEOs.


JEL Classification: K2, K22, G30, G34, J30
______________________________

"Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive
 Compensation, Part II: Power and Pay"

      BY:  LUCIAN ARYE BEBCHUK
              Harvard Law School
              National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
           JESSE M. FRIED
              University of California, Berkeley
              School of Law (Boalt Hall)

Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=537810

    Date:  February 2004

 Contact:  LUCIAN ARYE BEBCHUK
   Email:  Mailto:bebchuk@law.harvard.edu
  Postal:  Harvard Law School
           1563 Massachusetts Avenue
           Cambridge, MA 02138  UNITED STATES
   Phone:  617-495-3138
     Fax:  617-496-3119
 Co-Auth:  JESSE M. FRIED
   Email:  Mailto:FRIEDJ@MAIL.LAW.BERKELEY.EDU
  Postal:  University of California, Berkeley
           School of Law (Boalt Hall)
           Boalt Hall
           Berkeley, CA 94720-7200  UNITED STATES

ABSTRACT:
 This paper contains a draft of Part II of our forthcoming book,
 Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive
 Compensation (Harvard University Press, 2004). The book provides
 a detailed account of how structural flaws in corporate
 governance have enabled managers to influence their own pay and
 produced widespread distortions in pay arrangements. The book
 also examines how these flaws and distortions can best be
 addressed.

 Part II of the book shows how an understanding of the role of
 managerial power can help explain executive compensation
 practices. We provide a framework for assessing whether pay
 arrangements are a product of managerial influence. We discuss
 managers' interest in camouflaging the amount and the
 performance-insensitivity of their pay. Applying our framework,
 we discuss how managerial influence can help explain, among
 other things, the evidence on the relationship between
 managerial pay and managerial power; the use of retirement
 benefits and other compensation arrangements to provide stealth
 compensation; and the ability of departing managers to obtain
 more than their contractual entitlement.

 Other parts of the book are also available on the SSRN:
 Part I: The Official View and its Limits, is available at
 http://ssrn.com/abstract=537783.
 Part III: The Decoupling of Pay from Performance, is available
 at http://ssrn.com/abstract=546105.
 Part IV: Going Forward, is available at
 http://ssrn.com/abstract=546107.


JEL Classification: D23, G32, G34, G38, J33, J44, K22, M14
______________________________

"Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive
 Compensation, Part III: The Decoupling of Pay from Performance"

      BY:  LUCIAN ARYE BEBCHUK
              Harvard Law School
              National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
           JESSE M. FRIED
              University of California, Berkeley
              School of Law (Boalt Hall)

Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=546105

    Date:  February 2004

 Contact:  LUCIAN ARYE BEBCHUK
   Email:  Mailto:bebchuk@law.harvard.edu
  Postal:  Harvard Law School
           1563 Massachusetts Avenue
           Cambridge, MA 02138  UNITED STATES
   Phone:  617-495-3138
     Fax:  617-496-3119
 Co-Auth:  JESSE M. FRIED
   Email:  Mailto:FRIEDJ@MAIL.LAW.BERKELEY.EDU
  Postal:  University of California, Berkeley
           School of Law (Boalt Hall)
           Boalt Hall
           Berkeley, CA 94720-7200  UNITED STATES

ABSTRACT:
 This paper contains a draft of Part III of our forthcoming book,
 Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive
 Compensation (Harvard University Press, September 2004). The
 book provides a detailed account of how structural flaws in
 corporate governance have enabled managers to influence their
 own pay and produced widespread distortions in pay arrangements.
 The book also examines how these flaws and distortions can best
 be addressed.

 Part III of the book examines how managerial influence has
 operated to reduce the performance-sensitivity of executive pay.
 Among other things, we examine the structure of non-equity
 compensation, the design of conventional option plans, the use
 of restricted stock grants, and managers' freedom to unload
 options and shares.

 Other parts of the book are also available on the SSRN:
 Part I: The Official View and its Limits, is available at
 http://ssrn.com/abstract=537783.
 Part II: Power and Pay, is available at
 http://ssrn.com/abstract=537810.
 Part IV: Going Forward, is available at
 http://ssrn.com/abstract=546107.


JEL Classification: D23, G32, G34, G38, J33, J44, K22, M14
______________________________

"Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive
 Compensation, Part IV: Going Forward"

      BY:  LUCIAN ARYE BEBCHUK
              Harvard Law School
              National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
           JESSE M. FRIED
              University of California, Berkeley
              School of Law (Boalt Hall)

Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=546107

    Date:  February 2004

 Contact:  LUCIAN ARYE BEBCHUK
   Email:  Mailto:bebchuk@law.harvard.edu
  Postal:  Harvard Law School
           1563 Massachusetts Avenue
           Cambridge, MA 02138  UNITED STATES
   Phone:  617-495-3138
     Fax:  617-496-3119
 Co-Auth:  JESSE M. FRIED
   Email:  Mailto:FRIEDJ@MAIL.LAW.BERKELEY.EDU
  Postal:  University of California, Berkeley
           School of Law (Boalt Hall)
           Boalt Hall
           Berkeley, CA 94720-7200  UNITED STATES

ABSTRACT:
 This paper contains a draft of Part IV and the bibliography of
 our forthcoming book, Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled
 Promise of Executive Compensation (Harvard University Press,
 September 2004). The book provides a detailed account of how
 structural flaws in corporate governance have enabled managers
 to influence their own pay and have produced widespread
 distortions in pay arrangements. The book also examines how
 these flaws and distortions can best be addressed.

 Part IV of the book discusses how executive compensation - and
 corporate governance more generally - can be improved. We
 examine the extent to which pay arrangements can be improved by
 adopting board process rules, imposing shareholder approval
 requirements, and making pay more transparent. We conclude that
 problems with compensation arrangements cannot be fully
 addressed without ensuring that directors focus on shareholder
 interests and operate at arm's length from the executives whose
 compensation they set. To achieve this result, we argue, it is
 not sufficient to make directors independent of executives as
 recent reforms has sought to do; it is also necessary to make
 directors dependent on shareholders by changing the legal
 arrangements that insulate boards from shareholders.

 Other parts of the book are also available on the SSRN:
 Part I: The Official View and its Limits, is available at
 http://ssrn.com/abstract=537783.
 Part II: Power and Pay, is available at
 http://ssrn.com/abstract=537810.
 Part III: The Decoupling of Pay from Performance, is available
 at http://ssrn.com/abstract=546105.